Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Date
Msg-id 20170328025649.GC20361@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 08:04:34AM +0530, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> And I've answered it so many times by now :-) 

LOL

> Just to add more to what I just said in another email, note that HOT/WARM
> chains are created when a new root line pointer is created in the heap (a line
> pointer that has an index pointing to it). And a new root line pointer is
> created when a non-HOT/non-WARM update is performed. As soon as you do a
> non-HOT/non-WARM update, the next update can again be a WARM update even when
> everything fits in a single block. 
> 
> That's why for a workload which doesn't do HOT updates and where not all index
> keys are updated, you'll find every alternate update to a row to be a WARM
> update, even when there is no chain conversion. That itself can save lots of
> index bloat, reduce IO on the index and WAL.
> 
> Let me know if its still not clear and I can draw some diagrams to explain it.

Ah, yes, that does help to explain the 50% because 50% of updates are
now HOT/WARM.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Next
From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Date:
Subject: Re: On How To Shorten the Steep Learning Curve Towards PGHacking...