Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster
Date
Msg-id 20170220110456.2jupmfhxlizykmmc@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 2017-02-20 11:58:12 +0100, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> That being said, I did wonder myself if we should just deprecate float
> timestamps as well.

I think we need a proper deprecation period for that, given that the
conversion away will be painful for pg_upgrade using people with big
clusters.  So I think we should fix this regardless... :(

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] pg_ls_waldir() & pg_ls_logdir()