Re: [GENERAL] intentional or oversight? pg_dump -c does not restoredefault priviliges on schema public - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: [GENERAL] intentional or oversight? pg_dump -c does not restoredefault priviliges on schema public
Date
Msg-id 20170213165753.GR9812@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] intentional or oversight? pg_dump -c does not restore default priviliges on schema public  (Frank van Vugt <ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] intentional or oversight? pg_dump -c does not restoredefault priviliges on schema public  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-general
Frank,

* Frank van Vugt (ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl) wrote:
> Well, I didn't run into this issue with any of my db's that 'nicely' use
> tables in various schema's, it was actually the one 'older' db with everything
> in the public schema that brought it up, so maybe keeping one of those around
> isn't too bad an idea ;)

Yeah, I'll be including this in a regression test also, to make sure we
don't end up breaking this special case again in the future.

Thanks!

Stephen

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Frank van Vugt
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] intentional or oversight? pg_dump -c does not restore default priviliges on schema public
Next
From: François Beaulieu
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Potential bug with pg_notify