Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Date
Msg-id 20170124065305.j7rqku72ndesapxp@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017-01-23 21:11:37 -0600, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> End user data damage ought to prevented at all costs IMO.

Really, really, really not. We should do a lot, but if that'd be the
only priority we'd enable all the expensive as shit stuff and be so slow
that there'd be no users.  We'd never add new scalability/performance
features, because they'll initially have more bugs / increase
complexity. Etc.

Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2