Stephen Frost wrote:
> Tom,
>
> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> > BTW, so far as the HEAD version of this patch goes, I notice that
> > ATTACH PARTITION and DETACH PARTITION were recently added to the
> > list of exceptions. But they're not exceptions according to this
> > wording: they act on more than one table (the parent and the
> > partition), no? So we could simplify the sentence some more by
> > removing them again.
>
> I had considered removing those but thought that some users might think
> that they're only "altering" one table and therefore felt it made sense
> to keep those explicitly listed.
I agree with Stephen; it's not crystal clear from the user's POV that
the command is altering two tables. It's worth mentioning this
explicitly; otherwise this is just a documented gotcha.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
