> I looked at this and can see some of the argument on both sides, but
> if it's setting off static-analyzer warnings for some people, that
> seems like a sufficient reason to change it. We certainly make more
> significant changes than this in order to silence warnings.
>
> I rewrote the comment a bit more and pushed it.
Tom, thank you for committing this patch. And thanks everyone for your
contribution!
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
