Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?

From: David Fetter
Subject: Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?
Date: ,
Msg-id: 20160829192037.GE29482@fetter.org
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?  (Josh Berkus)
Responses: Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?  (julyanto SUTANDANG)
List: pgsql-advocacy

Tree view

Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?  (Josh Berkus, )
 Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?  (James Keener, )
 Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?  (David Fetter, )
  Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?  (Tomas Vondra, )
   Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
 Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?  (Josh Berkus, )
  Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?  (David Fetter, )
 Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?  (Josh Berkus, )
  Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?  (David Fetter, )
   Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?  (julyanto SUTANDANG, )
    Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?  (Bruce Momjian, )
    Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?  (Chris Travers, )

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:06:43PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 08/29/2016 11:46 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:41:48AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> On 08/29/2016 11:39 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 08:41:15PM -0400, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >>>> I suspect not, but I can't think of another example right now.
> >>>
> >>> There are a fair number that beat us to that punch (GPDB, HadoopDB,
> >>> etc.)
> >>
> >> Do they have parallel query on a single node?  I suppose you can have
> >> multiple shards-per-node, but that's still a different feature.
> >
> > I don't know of one offhand, but that distinction seems like a *VERY*
> > thin slice to be claiming.
>
> Yeah, it's certainly not terribly marketable. "First non-sharded
> parallel query".

PostgreSQL: we don't charge you a network hop to use another core ;)

Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-advocacy by date:

From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: DRAFT 9.6 release
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: DRAFT 9.6 release