Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
| From | julyanto SUTANDANG |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query? |
| Date | |
| Msg-id | CAGu3fESShZ76_+RaEfOjj1a4wX2MRW=gfn=J1q2N35MJhDt2HQ@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
| In response to | Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query? (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
| Responses |
Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel
query?
Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query? |
| List | pgsql-advocacy |
I thought that the real term of Parallel Query should talk about Query in a Host, Not multi host.
When multihost (clusters) is the context, of course it is parallel execution of query in every single host with single query each. So, applying term Parallel Query as the first RDBMS implement it, i think it is correct.
Julyanto SUTANDANG
Equnix Business Solutions, PT
(An Open Source and Open Mind Company)
www.equnix.co.id
Pusat Niaga ITC Roxy Mas Blok C2/42. Jl. KH Hasyim Ashari 125, Jakarta Pusat
T: +6221 22866662 F: +62216315281 M: +628164858028
Caution: The information enclosed in this email (and any attachments) may be legally privileged and/or confidential and is intended only for the use of the addressee(s). No addressee should forward, print, copy, or otherwise reproduce this message in any manner that would allow it to be viewed by any individual not originally listed as a recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized disclosure, dissemination, distribution, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the information herein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this message.Unless it is made by the authorized person, any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of PT Equnix Business Solutions.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 2:20 AM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:06:43PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 08/29/2016 11:46 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:41:48AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> On 08/29/2016 11:39 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 08:41:15PM -0400, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >>>> I suspect not, but I can't think of another example right now.
> >>>
> >>> There are a fair number that beat us to that punch (GPDB, HadoopDB,
> >>> etc.)
> >>
> >> Do they have parallel query on a single node? I suppose you can have
> >> multiple shards-per-node, but that's still a different feature.
> >
> > I don't know of one offhand, but that distinction seems like a *VERY*
> > thin slice to be claiming.
>
> Yeah, it's certainly not terribly marketable. "First non-sharded
> parallel query".
PostgreSQL: we don't charge you a network hop to use another core ;)
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate --
Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
pgsql-advocacy by date: