On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:08:54AM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 03:02:15PM +0300, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 02:54:33AM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:44:06PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:10:40AM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > > > [Action required within 72 hours. This is a generic notification.]
> > > > >
> > > > > The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item. Teodor,
> > > > > since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> > > > > item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
> > > > > 9.6 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on
> > > > > open item ownership[1] and send a status update within 72 hours of this
> > > > > message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may
> > > > > discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
> > > > > well in advance of shipping 9.6rc1. Consequently, I will appreciate your
> > > > > efforts toward speedy resolution. Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.GA447393@tornado.leadboat.com
> > > >
> > > > This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
> > > > a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> > > > update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> > > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.GA447393@tornado.leadboat.com
> > >
> > >IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED. This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is long past due
> > >for your status update. Please reacquaint yourself with the policy on open
> > >item ownership[1] and then reply immediately. If I do not hear from you by
> > >2016-06-16 07:00 UTC, I will transfer this item to release management team
> > >ownership without further notice.
> > >
> > >[1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.GA447393@tornado.leadboat.com
> >
> > I'm working on it right now.
>
> That is good news, but it is not a valid status update. In particular, it
> does not specify a date for your next update.
You still have not delivered the status update due thirteen days ago. If I do
not hear from you a fully-conforming status update by 2016-06-28 03:00 UTC, or
if this item ever again becomes overdue for a status update, I will transfer
the item to release management team ownership.
