Re: Should phraseto_tsquery('simple', 'blue blue') @@ to_tsvector('simple', 'blue') be true ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: Should phraseto_tsquery('simple', 'blue blue') @@ to_tsvector('simple', 'blue') be true ?
Date
Msg-id 20160615150854.GA1050145@tornado.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should phraseto_tsquery('simple', 'blue blue') @@ to_tsvector('simple', 'blue') be true ?  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
Responses Re: Should phraseto_tsquery('simple', 'blue blue') @@ to_tsvector('simple', 'blue') be true ?  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 03:02:15PM +0300, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 02:54:33AM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:44:06PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:10:40AM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > > [Action required within 72 hours.  This is a generic notification.]
> > > > 
> > > > The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item.  Teodor,
> > > > since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> > > > item.  If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
> > > > 9.6 open item, please let us know.  Otherwise, please observe the policy on
> > > > open item ownership[1] and send a status update within 72 hours of this
> > > > message.  Include a date for your subsequent status update.  Testers may
> > > > discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
> > > > well in advance of shipping 9.6rc1.  Consequently, I will appreciate your
> > > > efforts toward speedy resolution.  Thanks.
> > > > 
> > > > [1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.GA447393@tornado.leadboat.com
> > > 
> > > This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is past due for your status update.  Kindly send
> > > a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> > > update.  Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.GA447393@tornado.leadboat.com
> > 
> >IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED.  This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is long past due
> >for your status update.  Please reacquaint yourself with the policy on open
> >item ownership[1] and then reply immediately.  If I do not hear from you by
> >2016-06-16 07:00 UTC, I will transfer this item to release management team
> >ownership without further notice.
> >
> >[1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.GA447393@tornado.leadboat.com
> 
> I'm working on it right now.

That is good news, but it is not a valid status update.  In particular, it
does not specify a date for your next update.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Reviewing freeze map code
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Should pg_export_snapshot() and currtid() be tagged parallel-unsafe?