On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:44:17AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > That's basically what the software catalogue does, isn't it? It needs to be
> > revamped to be more user friendly, and more promoted, but as a basis?
>
> Sure, that kind of idea. I'd forgotten we had that. I think that we
> should go to a format with just one line for each piece of software,
> though, instead of a big box. And try to get it all one one page.
> And remove all of the proprietary products or put them in a separate
> section. And include only stuff that's actually reasonably widely
> used.
>
> Maybe we should just go stand up a wiki page to start. What's in the
> software catalog right now looks useless to me.
I think our wiki page that lists all the FDWs is great, so why can't we
do this for other external software?
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Foreign_data_wrappers
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
