Re: PGCTLTIMEOUT in pg_regress, or skink versus the clock - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: PGCTLTIMEOUT in pg_regress, or skink versus the clock
Date
Msg-id 20160421021231.GA2020479@tornado.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PGCTLTIMEOUT in pg_regress, or skink versus the clock  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PGCTLTIMEOUT in pg_regress, or skink versus the clock  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 06:38:56PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I am thinking that we missed a bet in commit 2ffa86962077c588
> et al, and that pg_regress's hard-wired 60-second start timeout ought to
> be overridable from an environment variable just as pg_ctl's timeout is.
> It might as well be the same environment variable, so I propose the
> attached patch.

> Any objections?

Looks reasonable.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Typos/Questions in bloom documentation