Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
Date
Msg-id 20160401083518.GE9074@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016-04-01 13:50:10 +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> I think it needs more number of runs.. After seeing this results I did not
> run head+pinunpin,
> 
> Head 64 Client 128 Client
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Run1 434860 356945
> Run2 275815 *275815*
> Run3 437872 366560
> Patch 64 Client 128 Client
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Run1 429520 372958
> Run2 446249 *167189*
> Run3 431066 381592
> Patch+Pinunpin  64 Client 128 Client
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Run1 338298 642535
> Run2 406240 644187
> Run3 595439 *285420 *

Could you describe the exact setup a bit more? Postgres settings,
pgbench parameters, etc.

What's the size of BufferDesc after applying the patch?

Thanks,

Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion
Next
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Phrase search ported to 9.6