David G. Johnston wrote:
> Tom doesn't care enough to veto and you don't really care...
>
> I'll admit it's awkward because it's abbreviated but if someone enters
> \watch 5 and then sees (5s) in the title I think they can put two and two
> together.
>
> If the watched query takes a long to run, or there is a disruption, knowing
> when the last one ran and how often it is supposed to run is useful info to
> have at ones fingertips. I have done this myself occasionally so I'm not
> speaking from theory. But I won't complain if its removed.
I like David's UI better FWIW.
(I'll also use this opportunity to complain again about not being able
to use floating point sleep time.)
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services