On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 08:51:36AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:02:01AM +0100, Damien Clochard wrote:
> > >I really like this idea. As you say, we can't actually enforce
> > >anything. But as long as the text is balanced and fair, we can *ask*
> > >for it, and I think many of them would have no problem with that. As
> > >for the contents I would make it shorter than what you have written,
> > >but the important parts to get in is what it is (RDBMS, open source),
> > >who makes it (community and what makes up of it) and the link back to
> > >the main website.
> >
> > Thanks for your answer Magnus. I think I'm going to start a brand
> > new thread and create a specific wiki page called "Corporate PR
> > Guidelines", if that sounds right.
>
> I think that would be helpful as we are having to guess some of these
> things at this point. You can even mention some of the press release
> first-sentence wording as a suggestion.
Oh, you might want to make the title more general as many of the
organizations issuing PR announcements might not be corporations, maybe
"Company PR Guidelines".
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +
