Re: Optimizing away second VACUUM heap scan when only BRIN indexes on table - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Optimizing away second VACUUM heap scan when only BRIN indexes on table
Date
Msg-id 20151221021446.GV2618@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Optimizing away second VACUUM heap scan when only BRIN indexes on table  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Responses Re: Optimizing away second VACUUM heap scan when only BRIN indexes on table  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Re: Optimizing away second VACUUM heap scan when only BRIN indexes on table  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: Optimizing away second VACUUM heap scan when only BRIN indexes on table  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 11/23/15 5:06 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> >I realize that the second scan performed by lazy_vacuum_heap() only
> >visits those pages known to contain dead tuples. However, the
> >experience of seeing problems with the random sampling of ANALYZE
> >makes me think that that might not be very helpful. There is no good
> >reason to think that there won't be a uniform distribution of dead
> >tuples across the heap, and so only visiting pages known to contain
> >dead tuples might be surprisingly little help even when there are
> >relatively few VACUUM-able tuples in the table.
> 
> Even worse is if you can't fit all the dead TIDs in memory and have to do
> multiple passes for no reason...

Since BRIN indexes cannot be primary keys nor unique keys, it's hard to
be convinced that the use case of a table with only BRIN indexes is
terribly interesting.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Typo in the comment above heap_prepare_freeze_tuple()
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimizing away second VACUUM heap scan when only BRIN indexes on table