Re: Is postgresql on Windows compatible with flex 2.6.0? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Is postgresql on Windows compatible with flex 2.6.0?
Date
Msg-id 20151210144145.GA2551@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is postgresql on Windows compatible with flex 2.6.0?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Is postgresql on Windows compatible with flex 2.6.0?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2015-12-10 09:39:30 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Victor Wagner <vitus@wagner.pp.ru> wrote:
> >> Postgres requires relatively recent Perl.  Version objects appeared in
> >> Perl 5.10 and most people would have something newer.
> 
> > AFAIK, the minimum requirement for perl is 5.8...
> 
> Yeah, that is our stated requirement, and we do have buildfarm members
> checking it on the Unix side (eg prairiedog runs 5.8.6).  I don't know
> if anyone is checking the MSVC-build scripts against an old Perl,
> though ... it seems possible that some more-recent constructs have
> crept into that pile of perl code without anyone noticing.

Tom, are you applying the patch, or should I?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Is postgresql on Windows compatible with flex 2.6.0?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.