Re: Is postgresql on Windows compatible with flex 2.6.0? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Is postgresql on Windows compatible with flex 2.6.0?
Date
Msg-id 12446.1449758370@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is postgresql on Windows compatible with flex 2.6.0?  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Is postgresql on Windows compatible with flex 2.6.0?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Victor Wagner <vitus@wagner.pp.ru> wrote:
>> Postgres requires relatively recent Perl.  Version objects appeared in
>> Perl 5.10 and most people would have something newer.

> AFAIK, the minimum requirement for perl is 5.8...

Yeah, that is our stated requirement, and we do have buildfarm members
checking it on the Unix side (eg prairiedog runs 5.8.6).  I don't know
if anyone is checking the MSVC-build scripts against an old Perl,
though ... it seems possible that some more-recent constructs have
crept into that pile of perl code without anyone noticing.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Is postgresql on Windows compatible with flex 2.6.0?