Michael,
* Michael Paquier (michael.paquier@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 10:23 PM, <calebmeredith8@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This doesn't seem to be intended as the GRANT specification allows it, =
and
> > CREATE POLICY supports the ALL command.
>=20
> Yeah, I would tend to agree that the existence of ALL contradicts the
> expression constraints that are in place when defining a non-ALL policy as
> we could basically ignore either the WITH CHECK or USING clauses defined =
in
> a policy defined depending on the DML or SELECT command used. To be more
> exact, for example with an ALL policy that has both a WITH CHECK and USING
> defined, we would ignore the USING clause with an INSERT query, right? We
> are in beta2 state now, so I don't think anything is going to change, but
> Stephen, your thoughts perhaps?
We could support allowing multiple commands for a policy and would just
need to adjust the checks to make sure that the policy definition makes
sense, but that's all new-feature type of work which would be for 9.6
and not a bug in the current implementation. I'm certainly not against
doing that, but it doesn't seem like a terribly high priority.
Thanks!
Stephen
