Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query
Date
Msg-id 20151022162646.GA22539@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query  (YUriy Zhuravlev <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query  (YUriy Zhuravlev <u.zhuravlev@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 07:15:35PM +0300, YUriy Zhuravlev wrote:
> Hello.
> Currently using nodeToString and stringToNode you can not pass a
> full plan. In this regard, what is the plan to fix it? Or in the
> under task parallel query does not have such a problem?
> 
> > This turns out not to be straightforward to code, because we don't
> > have a generic plan tree walker, 
> 
> I have an inner development. I am using python analyzing header
> files and generates a universal walker (parser, paths ,executer and
> etc trees), as well as the serializer and deserializer to jsonb.
> Maybe I should publish this code?

Please do.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: YUriy Zhuravlev
Date:
Subject: Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #13694: Row Level Security by-passed with CREATEUSER permission