On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 03:48:04PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 09:15:49AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > It seems to me that waiting for 9.6 for what's arguably a bug fix is too
> > > much. It's not like this is a new feature. Why don't we just make sure
> > > it is as correct as possible and get it done for 9.5? It's not even in
> > > beta yet, nor feature freeze.
> >
> > Well, I applied what I thought would work, but did not handle three
> > cases:
> >
> > * checking of hasoids by index specifications
> > * queries with multiple LIKE'ed tables
> > * matching inheritance behavior
> >
> > I am unclear if I should be addressing such complex issues at this point
> > in the development cycle. I can certainly apply this patch, but I need
> > someone else to tell me it is good and should be applied. I am also
> > thinking such review time would be better spent on patches submitted
> > long before mine.
>
> I have added regression tests to the patch, attached. I have included
> Tom's test that doesn't directly use LIKE.
Patch applied.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +
