Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From andres@anarazel.de
Subject Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches
Date
Msg-id 20150915184412.GC2086@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2015-09-15 14:39:51 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> We could, but since that would be strictly more annoying and less
> flexible than what we've already got, why would we?

I don't find the current approach of having to define tranches in every
backend all that convenient. It also completely breaks down if you want
to display locks from tranches that are only visible within a subset of
the backends - not that unlikely given that shared_preload_libraries is
a PITA.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches