On 2015-09-14 12:03:31 -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 9/13/15 2:43 AM, David Rowley wrote:
> >Are you worried about this because I've not focused on optimising float
> >timestamps as much as int64 timestamps? Are there many people compiling
> >with float timestamps in the real world?
>
> My $0.02: the default was changed some 5 years ago so FP time is probably
> pretty rare now. I don't think it's worth a bunch of extra work to speed
> them up.
Agreed. That's not why I'm arguing for it. It's about having kind of duplicate
code that's not exercised at al. by any common setup.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
