Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-09-08 07:06:04 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > 2015-09-07 21:44 GMT+02:00 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>:
> > > The spellings for boolean values were a relatively small subset of what
> > > the backend accepts - it's now on,off,true,false,yes,no,1,0. I'm not
> > > sure whether that's a good idea. Comments?
> >
> > if somebody prefer true, false, and we will support only on, off, then the
> > tabcomplete will not be too user friendly :(
> >
> > "1, 0" can be out - but other?
>
> After sleeping on it I think we should keep all of them - they'll show
> for lots of "boolean like" GUCs (e.g. constraint_exclusion, sync_commit,
> huge_pages) so not showing them for booleans just seems
> inconsisten. Unless somebody protests pdq I'll push it that way.
Yeah, seems fine to list the whole lot.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
