On 2015-09-08 07:06:04 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2015-09-07 21:44 GMT+02:00 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>:
> > The spellings for boolean values were a relatively small subset of what
> > the backend accepts - it's now on,off,true,false,yes,no,1,0. I'm not
> > sure whether that's a good idea. Comments?
> >
>
> if somebody prefer true, false, and we will support only on, off, then the
> tabcomplete will not be too user friendly :(
>
> "1, 0" can be out - but other?
After sleeping on it I think we should keep all of them - they'll show
for lots of "boolean like" GUCs (e.g. constraint_exclusion, sync_commit,
huge_pages) so not showing them for booleans just seems
inconsisten. Unless somebody protests pdq I'll push it that way.
Andres
