Re: Should \o mean "everything?" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: Should \o mean "everything?"
Date
Msg-id 20150831201201.GA21834@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should \o mean "everything?"  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 07:18:02PM +0000, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> 
> > In a failed attempt to send the output of \pset to a pipe, I
> > noticed that for reasons I find difficult to explain, not every
> > output gets redirected with \o.
> >
> > At first blush, I'd consider this inconsistency as a bug.
> >
> > What have I missed?
> 
> The documentation says:
> 
> | Arranges to save future query results to the file filename or
> | pipe future results to the shell command command. If no argument
> | is specified, the query output is reset to the standard output.
> |
> | "Query results" includes all tables, command responses, and
> | notices obtained from the database server, as well as output of
> | various backslash commands that query the database (such as \d),
> | but not error messages.
> 
> Are you seeing anything inconsistent with the documentation?  If
> so, what?

The documentation doesn't specify that a proper subset of the
backslash commands go through, and doesn't enumerate either the ones
that do or the ones that don't.

The way I see it, the fact that backslash commands aren't treated
consistently here would be a bug even if the inconsistency were
documented, which it is only vaguely by implication.

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Qingqing Zhou
Date:
Subject: Re: Horizontal scalability/sharding
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Horizontal scalability/sharding