On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:53:51PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:51:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > > I see 34 instance of "=>" in our docs. Shouldn't the '>' be escaped,
> > > e.g. =>?
> >
> > In principle, yes, though you can often get away with this as long as
> > there's not a '<' nearby ...
>
> Yeah, that's what I thought --- it seems sloppy. What I am not clear
> about is how to find other cases.
Done.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
