On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:51:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > I see 34 instance of "=>" in our docs. Shouldn't the '>' be escaped,
> > e.g. =>?
>
> In principle, yes, though you can often get away with this as long as
> there's not a '<' nearby ...
Yeah, that's what I thought --- it seems sloppy. What I am not clear
about is how to find other cases.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
