Re: 9.5 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: 9.5 release notes
Date
Msg-id 20150613014729.GA29422@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.5 release notes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 01:27:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 05:16:07PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> >> Would you also be able to mention something about�f15821e and�d222585 ?
>
> > I am going to defer to Tom on that.  I have added optimizer changes in
> > the past but he didn't feel it made sense unless there was some
> > user-visible change.
>
> I'd be inclined to document both of those.  We mentioned outer join
> removal when it was first added, in 9.0, so making a significant
> improvement in it seems worthy of mention also.  Both of these things
> are "user visible" to the extent that they affect EXPLAIN output.
>
> I'm not sure whether we need to document the semantic hazard that the
> second commit message worries about.

OK, I have added two items;  applied patch attached.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: deavid
Date:
Subject: Re: Is it possible to have a "fast-write" Index?
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: could not truncate directory "pg_subtrans": apparent wraparound