Re: [CORE] back-branch multixact fixes & 9.5 alpha/beta: schedule - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [CORE] back-branch multixact fixes & 9.5 alpha/beta: schedule
Date
Msg-id 20150608170836.GH24173@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [CORE] back-branch multixact fixes & 9.5 alpha/beta: schedule  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [CORE] back-branch multixact fixes & 9.5 alpha/beta: schedule
Re: [CORE] back-branch multixact fixes & 9.5 alpha/beta: schedule
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun  8, 2015 at 02:01:52PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun  8, 2015 at 12:39:24PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > > > Yeah, I think if we needed this out in an emergency, we would do it, but
> > > > based on the volume of recent releases, it would be hard.  Are we seeing
> > > > user reports of failures even on the newest released versions, or are
> > > > these preventive fixes?
> > > 
> > > User reports of failures.  See the thread about upgrading from 9.4.1
> > > to 9.4.2 and having the server *fail to start*.
> > 
> > OK, are these fixed in 9.4.2 or would the same failure happen in 9.4.3?
> 
> The fixes are not yet in any released branch, hence the rush to get
> these out.

OK, now I understand.  :-O  We have known failures that are not patched,
hence the desire for a release.  

I am a little concerned we are getting into a case where community
members dedicated to this issue are asking for a release, and it is
going into the core black hole, meaning there is no visibility on what
actions core is taking to make a decision.  (This is not a criticism,
but rather an observation of how it looks from a non-core-member
perspective.)

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1