Re: brin regression test intermittent failures - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: brin regression test intermittent failures
Date
Msg-id 20150526143002.GS5885@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: brin regression test intermittent failures  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: brin regression test intermittent failures  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> writes:
> > I meant to get around to looking into it, but FWIW I see BRIN-related
> > Valgrind issues. e.g.:
> 
> Fixed, see 79f2b5d583e2e2a7; but AFAICS this has no real-world impact
> so it does not explain whatever is happening on chipmunk.

Ah, thanks for diagnosing that.

The chipmunk failure is strange -- notice it only references the
= operators, except for type box for which it's ~= that fails.  The test
includes a lot of operators ...

Also, we have quite a number of ARM boxes: apart from chipmunk we have
gull, hamster, mereswine, dangomushi, axolotl, grison.  (hamster and
chipmunk report hostname -m as "armv6l", the others armv7l).  All of
them are running Linux, either Fedora or Debian.  Most are using gcc,
compilation flags look pretty standard.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Order of columns in query is important?!
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Why does txid_current() assign new transaction-id?