Re: pg_upgrade in 9.5 broken for adminpack - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_upgrade in 9.5 broken for adminpack
Date
Msg-id 20150417131136.GA26493@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade in 9.5 broken for adminpack  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 04:11:44PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> > Of course after sending that it became obvious.  The C function is not
> > getting called because the SQL function is marked as being strict, yet is
> > called with NULL arguments.
> >
> > Trivial patch attached to unset strict flag in pg_proc.h.
> >
> > But  CATALOG_VERSION_NO probably needs another bump as well.
> 
> This looks good to me. I have tested your fix and the problem goes
> away. create_empty_extension() was the only function not declared as
> STRICT before 30982be4 (see install_support_functions_in_new_db() in
> contrib/pg_upgrade/function.c).

OK, as I am not the author of that change, I am going to wait a little
while for the author to commit the fix.  I can see it is an easy mistake
to make.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Manipulating complex types as non-contiguous structures in-memory
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Replication identifiers, take 4