Re: Vaccum Stalling - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Vaccum Stalling
Date
Msg-id 20145.1184081504@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vaccum Stalling  (Brad Nicholson <bnichols@ca.afilias.info>)
Responses Re: Vaccum Stalling  (Brad Nicholson <bnichols@ca.afilias.info>)
Re: Vaccum Stalling  ("Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Brad Nicholson <bnichols@ca.afilias.info> writes:
> On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 11:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Oh, I forgot to mention --- you did check that vacuum_mem is set to
>> a pretty high value, no?  Else you might be doing a lot more
>> btbulkdelete scans than you need to.

> What would you define as high for 7.4?  I bumped it up to ~ 245mbs

That sounds like plenty --- you only need 6 bytes per dead tuple,
so that should be enough to handle all your 15-20M dead tuples in
one scan.

How big is this index again?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Vaccum Stalling
Next
From: Brad Nicholson
Date:
Subject: Re: Vaccum Stalling