Re: Vaccum Stalling - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Brad Nicholson
Subject Re: Vaccum Stalling
Date
Msg-id 1184083000.5455.12.camel@bnicholson-desktop
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vaccum Stalling  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Vaccum Stalling
List pgsql-general
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 11:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Brad Nicholson <bnichols@ca.afilias.info> writes:
> > On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 11:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Oh, I forgot to mention --- you did check that vacuum_mem is set to
> >> a pretty high value, no?  Else you might be doing a lot more
> >> btbulkdelete scans than you need to.
>
> > What would you define as high for 7.4?  I bumped it up to ~ 245mbs
>
> That sounds like plenty --- you only need 6 bytes per dead tuple,
> so that should be enough to handle all your 15-20M dead tuples in
> one scan.
>
> How big is this index again?

Not sure which one it's working on - there are 6 of them each are ~
2.5GB

--
Brad Nicholson  416-673-4106
Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Vaccum Stalling
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Vaccum Stalling