Re: opportunistic tuple freezing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: opportunistic tuple freezing
Date
Msg-id 20142.1253204653@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: opportunistic tuple freezing  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: opportunistic tuple freezing
List pgsql-hackers
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes:
> Does the community think that experimental performance testing is a
> must-have in order for this patch to be acceptable?

Dunno about others, but I think so.  It's complicating both the
implementation and the users-eye view of VACUUM, and I want more than
a hypothesis that we're going to get something useful out of that.

If we can't test it in a reasonable time frame for this commitfest,
then we should move it to the queue for the next one.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL