Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hannu Krosing
Subject Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL
Date
Msg-id 1253204585.778.182.camel@hvost1700
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 10:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 10:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> because it will break applications that depend on CTID.
> 
> > Do you know of any such applications out in the wild ?
> 
> Yes, they're out there.

How do they deal with concurrent UPDATEs ?

>             regards, tom lane
> 
-- 
Hannu Krosing   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Scalability and Availability   Services, Consulting and Training




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: opportunistic tuple freezing