Re: Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS
Date
Msg-id 20141114155430.GX28859@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
* Noah Misch (noah@leadboat.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:35:25AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Personally, I'm leaning towards the first as it's less clutter in the
> > output of psql.
>
> I'd agree for a new design, but I see too little to gain from changing it now.
> Today's behavior is fine.

To clarify- you mean with the changes described- using usesuper for
rolreplication and rolbypassrls instead of 'false' when dumping from
older versions, correct?

Note for all- rolreplication goes back to 9.1.  Are we thinking that
change should be backpatched?
Thanks,
    Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS