Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS
Date
Msg-id 20141113230045.GI28859@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
* Stephen Frost (sfrost@snowman.net) wrote:
> I'm happy to fix it either way (and fix it for 8.1, and back to.. what?
> Postgres95?)

Err.  That might have come off poorly- I didn't mean that sarcastically
but was really wondering how far back you test (or how far back we
feel pg_dumpall needs to work against..).  I was originally going to say
7.4, but then figured we might try to go back farther than even that
and, well, Postgres95 is the oldest we have "easy" access to..
Thanks!
    Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Missing FIN_CRC32 calls in logical replication code
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS