Re: Selectivity estimation for inet operators - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Emre Hasegeli
Subject Re: Selectivity estimation for inet operators
Date
Msg-id 20140831180030.GC8990@hasegeli-2.local
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Selectivity estimation for inet operators  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Selectivity estimation for inet operators
List pgsql-hackers
> What you did there is utterly unacceptable from a modularity standpoint;
> and considering that the values will be nowhere near right, the argument
> that "it's better than returning a constant" seems pretty weak.  I think
> you should just take that out again.

I will try to come up with a better, data type specific implementation
in a week.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Built-in binning functions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] Re: BUG #9555: pg_dump for tables with inheritance recreates the table with the wrong order of columns