On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 11:49:37AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Is this the patch you had in mind? I kept the pg_catalog filter. Do we
> > want to always show the replica identity line for \d+?
>
> Doesn't seem like a great idea to remove the filter tests for replident
> values and then not fix the display code to cope with those values.
>
> I think this display code is well south of minimal acceptability anyhow:
> if the column contains anything other than what it expects, it will print
> a lie, meaning it's entirely not future-proof. I'd suggest a switch()
> that prints "???" in the default: case.
Oh, good points. I have updated the attached patch.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
