Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext
Date
Msg-id 20140131214133.GT19957@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct  7, 2013 at 03:02:36PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > On 2013-10-04 15:15:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> Andres, are you (or is anyone) going to try to fix this assertion failure?
> >
> > I think short term replacing it by IsTransactionOrTransactionBlock() is
> > the way to go. Entirely restructuring how cache invalidation in the
> > abort path works is not a small task.
> 
> Well, if we're going to go that route, how about something like the
> attached?  I included the assert-change per se, an explanatory
> comment, and the test case that Noah devised to cause the current
> assertion to fail.

Is there any plan to commit this?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: FOR UPDATE/SHARE incompatibility with GROUP BY, DISTINCT, HAVING and window functions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Insert result does not match record count