On 2014-01-28 11:14:49 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 02:51:59PM -0800, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> > So anyway, *I* would object to applying that; it was meant to
> > illustrate what the comment, if any, should cover; not to be an
> > actual code change. I don't think the change that was pushed helps
> > that comment carry its own weight, either. If we can't do better
> > than that, we should just drop it.
> >
> > I guess I won't try to illustrate a point *that* particular way
> > again....
>
> OK, so does anyone object to removing this comment line?
Let's just not do anything. This is change for changes sake. Not
improving anything the slightest.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
