Re: New user group - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: New user group
Date
Msg-id 20140103180931.GK2543@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New user group  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-www
JD,

* Joshua D. Drake (jd@commandprompt.com) wrote:
> Understood. I was actually surprised at the Asia one but there is a
> difference hear. Where we are dealing with millions in Asia, we are
> dealing with 200k in Whatcom. The reason I picked Whatcom is that
> although 50% of the population lives in Bellingham, the other 50% is
> all within 30-45 minutes of Bellingham and I didn't want to exclude
> those areas.
>
> Oh and I forgot to give you the website:
>
> https://plus.google.com/communities/116781216881095067633

Neither the G+ page nor the SEAPUG look to have very much traffic.
Perhaps it'd make more sense for folks in Whatcom county to subscribe to
the SEAPUG list instead of creating another list that's going to have
very little traffic?  I realize it's not really a suburb of Seattle or
anything, but perhaps we can consider that list to be more broadly
"Washington state".

Another option might be to have Vancover or maybe a Western Canada
list, we currently only have Montreal & Toronto, but of course, both of
those lists are also nearly devoid of any activity..
Thanks,
    Stephen

pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: NC Triangle PUG mailing list
Next
From: Euler Taveira
Date:
Subject: Re: Channel operators for #postgresql-br ?