Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
Date
Msg-id 20131211154116.GC25227@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?  ("MauMau" <maumau307@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-12-12 00:31:25 +0900, MauMau wrote:
> What do you think of #5 and #6 when matching the above criteria?
> 
> 5. FATAL:  terminating walreceiver process due to administrator command
> 6. FATAL:  terminating background worker \"%s\" due to administrator command

Those are important if they happen outside a shutdown. So, if you really
want to remove them from there, you'd need to change the signalling to
handle the cases differently.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Replication Node Identifiers and crashsafe Apply
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum_work_mem