Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
Date
Msg-id 20131206133808.GE8935@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?  ("MauMau" <maumau307@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-12-06 22:35:21 +0900, MauMau wrote:
> From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> >No.  They are FATAL so far as the individual session is concerned.
> >Possibly some documentation effort is needed here, but I don't think
> >any change in the code behavior would be an improvement.
> 
> You are suggesting that we should add a note like "Don't worry about the
> following message.  This is a result of normal connectivity checking", don't
> you?
> 
> FATAL:  the database system is starting up

Uh. An explanation why you cannot connect to the database hardly seems
like a superflous log message.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "MauMau"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
Next
From: "Dr. Andreas Kunert"
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature request: Logging SSL connections