Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK
Date
Msg-id 20131105202637.GG14819@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 2013-11-05 12:21:23 -0800, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
>
> > Looks fine to me
>
> Any thoughts on whether this should be back-patched to 9.3?  I can
> see arguments both ways, and don't have a particularly strong
> feeling one way or the other.

Hehe. I was wondering myself. I'd tentatively say no - unless we also
backpatch the debugging patch there doesn't seem to be good reason to
since the likelihood of conficts due to it doesn't seem very high.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Add cassert-only checks against unlocked use of relations