Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK
Date
Msg-id 1383688092.58848.YahooMailNeo@web162901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 2013-11-05 12:21:23 -0800, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
>>
>>> Looks fine to me
>>
>> Any thoughts on whether this should be back-patched to 9.3?  I
>> can see arguments both ways, and don't have a particularly
>> strong feeling one way or the other.
>
> Hehe. I was wondering myself. I'd tentatively say no - unless we
> also backpatch the debugging patch there doesn't seem to be good
> reason to since the likelihood of conficts due to it doesn't seem
> very high.

Works for me.  Done.

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Add cassert-only checks against unlocked use of relations
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Add cassert-only checks against unlocked use of relations