Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
Date
Msg-id 20131010145958.GM7092@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
Responses Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 07:24:26AM -0700, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > I actually had the thought that it might be something we'd integrate
> > *into* initdb.  So you'd do initdb --system-memory 8GB or something
> > like that and it would do the rest.  That'd be slick, at least IMHO.
> 
> How would you handle the case that the machine (whether physical or
> a VM) later gets more RAM?  That's certainly not unheard of with
> physical servers, and with VMs I'm not sure that the database
> server would necessarily go through a stop/start cycle for it.

Yes, going from a non-dedicated to a dedicated database server, adding
RAM, or moving the cluster to another server could all require an initdb
to change auto-tuned values.  This is why I think we will need to
auto-tune in the backend, rather than via initdb.  I do think an
available_mem parameter for initdb would help though, to be set in
postgresql.conf.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Auto-tuning work_mem and maintenance_work_mem