Re: relscan_details.h - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: relscan_details.h
Date
Msg-id 20131002125942.GB137331@tornado.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: relscan_details.h  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: relscan_details.h
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:12:05PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> If we had not made massive cleanup changes years ago, our code would not
> be as good as it is today.  By avoiding cleanup to reduce the burden on
> people who use our code, we are positioning our code on a slow decline
> in clarity.
> 
> What I don't want to do is get into a mode where every code cleanup has
> to be verified that it isn't going to excessively burden outside code
> users.  Cleanup is hard enough, and adding another check to that process
> makes cleanup even less likely.

I don't disagree with that, but I would describe the proposal as a mild
dirty-up for the sake of build performance, not a cleanup.

-- 
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB                                 http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: No Index-Only Scan on Partial Index
Next
From: Sameer Thakur
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation