Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names
Date
Msg-id 20130906133829.GD600952@alap2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-02-25 21:13:25 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > b) allow variables to start with a digit from the second level onwards.
> 
> That seems like a seriously bad idea.  I note that SET does *not* allow
> this;

Hm. One thing about this is that we currently allow something silly as:
SET "1"."1bar""blub" = 3;

So I'd like to either restrict SET here or allow the same for guc-file.l
parsed GUCs. Any opinions?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "MauMau"
Date:
Subject: [bug fix] strerror() returns ??? in a UTF-8/C database with LC_MESSAGES=non-ASCII
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names